The Moscow Murders and More

In the mid-2000s, Jeffrey Epstein faced mounting allegations in Palm Beach, Florida, that he had sexually abused dozens of underage girls under the guise of paying them for massages. The case began in 2005 when the parents of a 14-year-old girl reported him to local police, prompting a months-long investigation that uncovered a network of young girls—many recruited by other minors—who said they were coerced into sexual acts at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. Police gathered statements, physical evidence, and corroborating accounts, ultimately identifying over 30 potential victims. The Palm Beach Police Department recommended multiple felony charges, including unlawful sexual activity with minors and lewd and lascivious acts. Instead of proceeding to a state trial, the case was taken over by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, leading to the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Brokered behind closed doors, the NPA allowed Epstein to plead guilty in state court to two lesser prostitution-related charges—one involving a minor—in exchange for federal prosecutors agreeing not to pursue broader sex trafficking charges. He served 13 months in the Palm Beach County jail under a work-release program that let him leave six days a week. The deal also granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators,” effectively shielding alleged enablers from prosecution. This resolution, kept secret from victims in violation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, became a flashpoint for public outrage and later federal litigation when it was revealed just how sweeping and lenient the agreement had been. In this episode, we see that corruption in action as we hear from one of Jeffrey Epstein's first accusers during a deposition given in 2008. to contact me: gov.uscourts.flsd.318730.1.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

For years, Bill Clinton has managed to stay largely on the periphery of the Epstein scandal, despite documented flights on the financier’s private jet and multiple photographs placing him in Epstein’s orbit. His denials, combined with a media environment reluctant to press too hard on a former president, have allowed him to weather the storm with minimal direct scrutiny. While others in Epstein’s circle faced lawsuits, depositions, and public disgrace, Clinton benefited from a mix of political insulation and a public narrative that treated his connections as incidental rather than integral. That protective bubble may now be at risk. With a subpoena in play, Clinton could be compelled to answer questions under oath—something that strips away the layers of carefully crafted statements and PR-managed denials. The risk isn’t just reputational; sworn testimony opens the door to perjury charges if his answers contradict existing evidence or witness accounts. For a figure who has spent decades avoiding legal entanglement over Epstein, this moment could mark a sharp turn from calculated distance to unavoidable confrontation. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: The truth about Bill Clinton's cozy friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his 'lovely girls' as House subpoenas testimony Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Trump administration has publicly shifted blame onto the judiciary after Judge Paul Engelmayer denied the DOJ’s request to unseal the Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts. Officials characterized the ruling as the sole obstacle to transparency, framing the decision as an independent judicial choice that left them powerless. This narrative positions the court as the reason critical evidence remains sealed, sidestepping the fact that the administration’s legal strategy relied on a request widely expected to be rejected under long-standing grand jury secrecy rules. Critics argue this was a calculated move, allowing the DOJ to appear committed to public disclosure while ensuring the outcome protected powerful individuals named in the proceedings. By portraying the denial as a judicial overreach, the administration diverts public scrutiny from its own role in structuring a motion that was legally doomed from the outset. The result is a narrative that casts the White House and DOJ as frustrated truth-seekers—while the practical effect is the continued suppression of information that could implicate high-profile figures in Epstein’s network. Also... Reports that Ghislaine Maxwell could be considered for a work release program have drawn swift outrage, given the gravity of her crimes and the high-profile nature of her conviction. Critics point out that such leniency would be a slap in the face to survivors, especially in light of the systemic failures that allowed her and Jeffrey Epstein to operate for decades. The very notion of Maxwell leaving prison custody for any form of outside employment fuels accusations that the system remains rigged for the well-connected, where wealth and influence translate into privileges ordinary inmates could never dream of. The idea isn’t just offensive—it’s a stark reminder of how the justice system bends under the weight of celebrity and political entanglements. Work release for someone convicted of trafficking minors in connection with one of the most notorious sex abuse networks in modern history would send a clear message: if you’re rich enough, powerful enough, and connected enough, consequences are negotiable. This isn’t rehabilitation—it’s erosion of accountability, and it turns the concept of justice into little more than a press release slogan. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: White House criticizes judge for blocking release of Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury materials | Fox News 'Sickening!' Ghislaine Maxwell's work release from prison sparks outrage - Raw Story Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Recent biographies and investigative accounts reframe Ghislaine Maxwell not merely as Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice, but as a critical gatekeeper who facilitated his entrée into elite circles—including the British royal family. According to author Andrew Lownie’s new book Entitled, Maxwell leveraged her longstanding friendship with Prince Andrew (which began during his Oxford-era years) to introduce Epstein into royal social settings. Maxwell reportedly used Andrew as social bait to lure prominent individuals, enhancing Epstein’s access to power and influence—passing as much more than a mere sidekick in Epstein’s networks. These revelations depict Maxwell as a central enabler whose social maneuvering had profound consequences for the monarchy’s reputation. These accounts align with what Prince Andrew himself acknowledged in a 2019 Newsnight interview—that he met Epstein through Maxwell. He confirmed that Epstein and Maxwell attended a shooting weekend at Sandringham in 2000 at his invitation, though he portrayed the weekend as innocuous. Nonetheless, archival emails, photographs, and court filings have illustrated the depth of their association, underscoring how Maxwell’s social influence and ties to Andrew played a pivotal role in Epstein’s infiltration of high-society networks. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: ‘Entitled’ Reveals Ghislaine Maxwell’s Grip on Prince Andrew Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the case of Jane Doe v. Leon Black (Civil Action No.: 1:23-cv-06418-JGLC), Plaintiff Jane Doe has filed a memorandum opposing Defendant Leon Black's motion to compel her to publicly disclose her full name. Doe argues that revealing her identity would subject her to undue harassment and invasion of privacy, especially given the sensitive nature of the allegations, which include sexual assault. She emphasizes that proceeding under a pseudonym is essential to protect her from potential retaliation and to preserve her privacy. Doe further contends that maintaining her anonymity does not prejudice the defendant, as Black is already aware of her true identity and can adequately prepare his defense. She asserts that courts often permit plaintiffs to proceed pseudonymously in cases involving sexual assault to encourage victims to come forward without fear of public exposure. Therefore, Doe requests that the court deny Black's motion and allow her to continue using a pseudonym throughout the proceedings. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.127.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to the civil lawsuit filed against him under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, Leon Black sought to unmask the identity of his accuser, known in court filings as Jane Doe. Black’s legal team argued that anonymity undermined his ability to defend himself and conduct a fair investigation into the allegations. They filed motions urging the court to compel the woman to publicly reveal her name, claiming that her accusations were damaging his reputation and that shielding her identity placed him at an unfair legal disadvantage. This move was widely criticized by victim advocates, who saw it as a tactic meant to intimidate and discourage other survivors from coming forward, especially in cases involving powerful, well-connected defendants. Jane Doe’s legal team pushed back forcefully, emphasizing that her anonymity was legally protected under the Adult Survivors Act and critical to her safety and well-being. They argued that forcing her to go public would expose her to harassment, retraumatization, and potential danger. The court initially ruled in her favor, allowing her to proceed under a pseudonym. The broader implications of Black’s attempt to identify his accuser reflect a familiar dynamic in high-profile sexual assault cases—where wealthy defendants use aggressive legal maneuvers to shift the focus away from the allegations and onto the accuser. In the context of Epstein’s network, this tactic is seen as part of a pattern of silencing, discrediting, and outlasting survivors through sheer financial and institutional power. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.144.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The lawsuit filed by Jane Doe against billionaire Leon Black alleges that he raped her at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse when she was a vulnerable young woman in her early twenties. Filed in 2023 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, the civil suit claims Black used Epstein’s residence—a known hub of abuse—as the setting for the assault, and that Epstein facilitated the encounter. Jane Doe alleges that she was trafficked and groomed within Epstein’s network and that Black’s actions were part of the larger pattern of abuse and exploitation that Epstein orchestrated for his powerful associates. The lawsuit accuses Black not only of rape, but also of intentional infliction of emotional distress and other civil claims tied to Epstein’s broader trafficking enterprise. Black has denied the allegations and filed a countersuit against the accuser and her attorneys, claiming extortion and reputational harm. However, the civil complaint against him highlights a critical and recurring theme in the Epstein saga: the deep connections between Epstein and prominent men who allegedly used his network for their own gratification under the guise of friendship or philanthropy. The suit adds to the growing scrutiny of Black’s long-standing ties to Epstein, including previous revelations that he paid Epstein over $150 million for undisclosed “financial advice” long after Epstein’s 2008 conviction. Jane Doe’s case underscores how Epstein’s reach extended well beyond his own crimes, into the lives—and alleged actions—of the elite men he surrounded himself with. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.152.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

With the Bryan Kohberger trial being delayed being a forgone conclusion at this point, many people have chimed in with their opinions on how the delay might hurt or help both sides. In this episode, we hear from a few of those experts as they breakdown the current situation in Moscow and what might be coming next as we await the trial of Bryan Kohberger. (commercial at 8:11) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger trial delay buys defense time to build alibi, concerns about memory of lone witness | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

There have been several search warrants executed against Bryan Kohberger but none of them that we have see thus far, has yielded the haul that the authorities seized in Pennsylvania. In this episode, we hear from some legal experts who weigh in on that evidence and where it all might fit in. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger's Pennsylvania warrants: Experts break down key evidence | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger was someone who flew under the radar for most of his life. That all changed after he was named a suspect in the murder of four college students in Moscow Idaho. Now, we are hearing more about Bryan Kohberger's life before being named a suspect from the people he grew up around in Lehigh county. In this episode, we hear from some of those folks who recount their own experience's with him as we continue to try to understand the motivation for the horrendous murders. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger’s life under the radar: Walking in the footsteps of an alleged mass murderer - lehighvalleylive.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger was someone who flew under the radar for most of his life. That all changed after he was named a suspect in the murder of four college students in Moscow Idaho. Now, we are hearing more about Bryan Kohberger's life before being named a suspect from the people he grew up around in Lehigh county. In this episode, we hear from some of those folks who recount their own experience's with him as we continue to try to understand the motivation for the horrendous murders. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger’s life under the radar: Walking in the footsteps of an alleged mass murderer - lehighvalleylive.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was far more than a secluded estate—it was a fortress of influence, shielded by political connections, legal loopholes, and geographic isolation. Acquired in the early 1990s through ties to the powerful King family, the sprawling property benefited from a sex offender registry loophole that allowed Epstein to avoid public monitoring after his 2008 conviction. With friends like former Governor Bill Richardson, proximity to the elite Santa Fe Institute, and state trust land leases that expanded his buffer of privacy, Epstein found in New Mexico a jurisdiction uniquely suited to let him operate unchecked. Despite credible victim accounts placing abuse at the ranch, New Mexico authorities never conducted a serious investigation, choosing instead to hand the matter over to federal prosecutors. This “punting” avoided the political fallout that might have come from probing Epstein’s local connections and land deals, but it also ensured that years of potential evidence went uncollected. By the time the federal case took center stage in 2019, Zorro Ranch was little more than a missed opportunity for justice—proof that in New Mexico, as elsewhere, the powerful can secure safe harbor when the right people look the other way. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico was far more than a secluded estate—it was a fortress of influence, shielded by political connections, legal loopholes, and geographic isolation. Acquired in the early 1990s through ties to the powerful King family, the sprawling property benefited from a sex offender registry loophole that allowed Epstein to avoid public monitoring after his 2008 conviction. With friends like former Governor Bill Richardson, proximity to the elite Santa Fe Institute, and state trust land leases that expanded his buffer of privacy, Epstein found in New Mexico a jurisdiction uniquely suited to let him operate unchecked. Despite credible victim accounts placing abuse at the ranch, New Mexico authorities never conducted a serious investigation, choosing instead to hand the matter over to federal prosecutors. This “punting” avoided the political fallout that might have come from probing Epstein’s local connections and land deals, but it also ensured that years of potential evidence went uncollected. By the time the federal case took center stage in 2019, Zorro Ranch was little more than a missed opportunity for justice—proof that in New Mexico, as elsewhere, the powerful can secure safe harbor when the right people look the other way. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) are set to co-host a bipartisan press conference at the U.S. Capitol on September 3, 2025, where survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse will speak—some for the first time—about their experiences. The event is part of a broader push to advance the Epstein Files Transparency Act and a discharge petition aimed at forcing Attorney General Pam Bondi to release Epstein-related legal documents in a fully searchable, downloadable format. The lawmakers say the purpose is not only to give the survivors a national platform but also to press Congress to confront the lack of accountability and secrecy that has long surrounded the case. The move comes amid growing bipartisan momentum, including support from a dozen Republicans, to bypass House leadership and force a vote on releasing the documents with victim-protective redactions. Opposition has been notable from figures like House Speaker Mike Johnson and former President Trump, who have dismissed or downplayed the effort—Johnson citing privacy concerns and Trump labeling it a “hoax.” Massie, Khanna, and their allies counter that transparency with safeguards is both achievable and necessary, framing the event as a test of whether Congress will side with survivors or perpetuate the culture of secrecy that shielded Epstein and his network for decades. Also... A federal judge has rejected the Justice Department’s bid to unseal grand jury documents from the Ghislaine Maxwell case, ruling that the material would add virtually nothing to what was already made public during her 2021 trial. The judge emphasized that the records in question did not include victim or witness testimony but rather law enforcement summaries that revealed no new names, crime scenes, or substantive investigative details. This effectively dismantled the DOJ’s framing of the request as a major transparency effort, revealing it instead as an overhyped move with negligible informational value. The decision exposes the DOJ’s ongoing pattern of performative transparency in the Epstein matter—announcing high-profile actions that, when examined closely, produce no real accountability. By seeking the release of redundant documents under the guise of public disclosure, the Department appears more interested in optics than substance, further fueling skepticism over whether it is genuinely committed to uncovering the truth. Rather than clarifying the historical record, this latest maneuver reinforces the perception that the DOJ is managing the Epstein scandal as a political distraction rather than confronting its deep-rooted failures. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Trump Nemesis Is Bringing Epstein Victims to Capitol to Push for Files Release Epstein files: A judge confirms the Trump team’s smokescreen | CNN Politics Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Rinaldo Rizzo, the Dubins’ former house manager, delivered a harrowing deposition recounting one of the most disturbing moments later revealed in court documents. He described finding a distraught 15-year-old Swedish girl in the Dubins’ kitchen—visibly shaking, silent, and terrified. Through tears, Rizzo recalled how she whispered that she’d been held against her will on Epstein’s private island, where Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen had demanded sex, taken her passport and phone, and threatened her into silence. The girl seemed to have been trafficked, stripped of autonomy, and dropped into the Dubin home, stripped of any ability to call for help. Rizzo further testified that Maxwell and Epstein were both involved in the girl’s situation, and that after the conversation at the Dubin residence, she was soon sent back to Sweden. The Dubins have publicly denied the account, calling it false and defamatory. Nonetheless, Rizzo’s sworn statement, combined with his emotional delivery in court, has been widely cited as one of the most disturbing firsthand accounts to emerge from the Epstein–Maxwell legal proceedings, placing the Dubin household in direct proximity to an alleged trafficking victim. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Source: Butler for wealthy NYC couple says he met Swedish girl, 15, who was Jeffrey Epstein's 'sex slave' | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a scathing 31-page ruling, Judge Paul Engelmayer rebuffed the Trump administration’s push to unseal grand jury transcripts in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s key enablers. He asserted that the DOJ’s argument—that the transcripts would shed “meaningful new information” about Epstein’s or Maxwell’s crimes—was "demonstrably false" and that anyone expecting revelatory disclosures would be left feeling “disappointed and misled.” The judge bluntly concluded there is "no ‘there’ there," noting the materials added nothing substantive beyond what was disclosed during Maxwell’s 2021 trial and civil proceedings. Moreover, Engelmayer criticized the DOJ’s motion not merely for its emptiness but also for its apparent tactical intent, describing it as a "diversion" rather than a genuine transparency effort. He emphasized that releasing these transcripts could do real harm to the foundational secrecy of grand jury proceedings, which protect both the integrity of investigations and the reputations of uncharged individuals. With no victim testimony included—only summaries from two law enforcement officers—the request was deemed not only unnecessary but dangerous in precedent. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Manhattan judge denies Trump admin bid to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Prince Andrew interview on BBC Newsnight came about after Buckingham Palace sought to clear his name amid growing scrutiny over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The idea was first pitched when Prince Andrew’s then-private secretary, Amanda Thirsk, was in discussions with BBC journalist Emily Maitlis and Newsnight editor Esme Wren about a possible interview. Initially, the palace wanted to use the interview to refute allegations that Prince Andrew had sexually abused Virginia Giuffre, who alleged she was trafficked to him by Epstein when she was 17. Thirsk and Andrew saw it as an opportunity to publicly address the controversy, believing it would help him regain credibility. The interview was arranged through direct negotiations between Thirsk and the Newsnight team, with Prince Andrew ultimately agreeing to the sit-down, which was filmed inside Buckingham Palace in November 2019. However, the interview turned into a public relations disaster for Prince Andrew. Instead of clearing his name, his lack of remorse, bizarre explanations, and contradictions only fueled greater criticism. He infamously claimed he could not have been with Giuffre on the alleged night because he was at Pizza Express in Woking and insisted he could not sweat due to a medical condition. The broadcast led to intense backlash, forcing Andrew to step back from royal duties days later. BBC journalist Sam McAlister, who negotiated the interview, later revealed that Andrew and his team failed to anticipate how damning his answers would sound, leading to what is now regarded as one of the most disastrous royal interviews in history. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the September 2024 episode of the Lex Fridman Podcast, Donald Trump discussed the ongoing controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s confidential files and client list. He stated that, if re‑elected, he would have “no problem” releasing additional Epstein‑related documents and said he would “probably” make the client list public—positioning the release as a matter of transparency subject to his re‑election. That promise—to “have no problem” unsealing the Epstein files if re-elected, voiced on the Lex Fridman podcast—now rings hollow given his administration’s actions. Despite that pledge, no substantive new revelations have been made. The Department of Justice, led by AG Pam Bondi, released heavily redacted materials in February and claimed there’s no client list—an assertion that infuriated many supporters and was declared “a lot of redacted nothing” by critics. Even under mounting pressure—including subpoenas from the House Oversight Committee and investigations into Clinton, Comey, and others—the administration has shifted from transparency to deflection, labeling the entire Epstein files saga a “Democratic hoax” and telling supporters not to dwell on it. Also.. A Business Insider analysis of unsealed court records revealed that Donald Trump is identified as John Doe 174 in a set of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents. These “Doe” placeholders were used to anonymize nearly 200 individuals mentioned in the files—ranging from Epstein’s wealthy acquaintances to others referenced in passing. The revelation stemmed from a 2024 court order that unsealed previously redacted information, including the specific identity behind Doe 174. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Trump suggests he’ll release Jeffrey Epstein ‘client list’ if elected (nypost.com) source: It Sure Looks Like Donald Trump Is Doe 174 in Epstein Documents (businessinsider.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 5-22-23 The cost of an investigation as vast and complex as the one we saw in Moscow, Idaho has an enormous price tag that comes with it and now that the bills are starting to come in, the Mayor and the city are starting to ring the alarm bells about how stretched thin the town is when it comes to finances. In this episode, we take a look at some of those costs that were incurred during the investigation and how the meter is still running as the trial remains on the distant horizon. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger Investigation Expenses Leave Moscow Facing Financial Brink (newsweek.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 5-20-23 It has been roughly seven months since the gruesome discovery of four dead college students was made at a house on King Road in Moscow Idaho. Now, after 7 months of investigation, including the arrest of the one and only suspect, Bryan Kohberger, we are taking a look at the the past seven months and how that has led us to where we are currently at today. (commercial at 16:26) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: What we know about the Idaho college murders as Bryan Kohberger faces arraignment | The Independent Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.