The Moscow Murders and More

​In the motion filed on April 17, 2025, Sean Combs' legal team seeks to exclude video evidence related to a March 5, 2016 incident at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles. The defense argues that the CNN footage presented by the government is inadmissible due to alterations, manipulations, and being out of sequence. They assert that CNN paid for, copied, and presented the footage in unknown ways, ultimately destroying the original, rendering it inaccurate. Additionally, the defense challenges two iPhone videos, claiming they are re-recordings of surveillance footage that differ materially from the CNN compilation. The defense contends that these videos cannot be authenticated under Federal Rule of Evidence 901, violate the "Best Evidence" Rule (Rule 1002) due to the absence of original footage, and should be excluded under Rule 403 as their prejudicial impact outweighs any probative value. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.243.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a memorandum dated April 17, 2025, Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal team opposed a motion to quash a subpoena directed at Cassie Ventura, a key accuser in his upcoming federal trial. The defense argued that the subpoena, which sought drafts of Ventura's memoir, personal diaries, journals, and bank statements, was justified under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c). They contended that these materials could contain information pertinent to Combs' defense, asserting that the requests were specific, relevant, and not oppressive. The defense emphasized that the subpoena aimed to uncover evidence that might challenge Ventura's credibility or provide context to her allegations.​ Furthermore, Combs' attorneys addressed concerns about the breadth of the subpoena, arguing that it did not constitute a "fishing expedition" but was a targeted effort to obtain materials directly related to the case. They maintained that the requested documents could reveal inconsistencies or motivations behind Ventura's claims, thereby playing a crucial role in ensuring a fair trial. The memorandum cited legal precedents supporting the admissibility of such evidence when it bears directly on the issues at hand. Ultimately, the defense sought to demonstrate that the subpoena was a legitimate tool for gathering evidence essential to Combs' defense strategy.​ to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.256.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. (commercial at 7:17) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. (commercial at 7:17) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. (commercial at 7:17) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we once again discussing the gag order. This time, we are taking a look at Kohberger's response to the AP's attempt to act as an Intervenor. (commercial at 7:17) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 1-9-23 In this episode, we hear from some experts who give us their opinion why Bryan Kohberger might have returned to the house after police say he brutally murdered four people a mere hours before. (commercial at 6:25) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger Drove By To See 'Fruits of His Actions,' Ex-FBI Agent Says (msn.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In his charging requests submitted to the court, Sean “Diddy” Combs and his legal team are seeking to shape the jury instructions in a way that narrows the scope of the government’s accusations and emphasizes the burden of proof required for a conviction. Central to the requests is the insistence that jurors be explicitly instructed not to infer guilt based on Diddy's celebrity status, past lifestyle, or media portrayals. The defense wants the judge to highlight that fame and wealth are not indicators of criminality, and that allegations alone—no matter how salacious or repeated—do not amount to evidence. Furthermore, they ask that any references to other alleged “bad acts” not directly charged in the indictment be carefully limited to prevent undue prejudice. The defense is also pushing for jury instructions that stress the presumption of innocence and the government’s obligation to prove each element of every charge beyond a reasonable doubt. They are particularly focused on the RICO charges, asking that the court clarify the complex nature of racketeering law and caution jurors not to convict based merely on association with others accused of wrongdoing. By parsing the instructions this way, Combs’ team is attempting to preemptively insulate him from the cumulative weight of the government’s broader narrative, which alleges years of systemic abuse, coercion, and criminal enterprise. Ultimately, these requests are a tactical maneuver to keep the trial tightly focused on the evidence at hand—and to limit the emotional or cultural weight the prosecution hopes to bring into the courtroom. to contact me: bobbycapucci source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.273.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In his charging requests submitted to the court, Sean “Diddy” Combs and his legal team are seeking to shape the jury instructions in a way that narrows the scope of the government’s accusations and emphasizes the burden of proof required for a conviction. Central to the requests is the insistence that jurors be explicitly instructed not to infer guilt based on Diddy's celebrity status, past lifestyle, or media portrayals. The defense wants the judge to highlight that fame and wealth are not indicators of criminality, and that allegations alone—no matter how salacious or repeated—do not amount to evidence. Furthermore, they ask that any references to other alleged “bad acts” not directly charged in the indictment be carefully limited to prevent undue prejudice. The defense is also pushing for jury instructions that stress the presumption of innocence and the government’s obligation to prove each element of every charge beyond a reasonable doubt. They are particularly focused on the RICO charges, asking that the court clarify the complex nature of racketeering law and caution jurors not to convict based merely on association with others accused of wrongdoing. By parsing the instructions this way, Combs’ team is attempting to preemptively insulate him from the cumulative weight of the government’s broader narrative, which alleges years of systemic abuse, coercion, and criminal enterprise. Ultimately, these requests are a tactical maneuver to keep the trial tightly focused on the evidence at hand—and to limit the emotional or cultural weight the prosecution hopes to bring into the courtroom. to contact me: bobbycapucci source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.273.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On May 9, 2025, NBC's Dateline aired a two-hour special titled "The Terrible Night on King Road," delving into the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students and the case against Bryan Kohberger. The episode presented previously unreleased evidence, including surveillance footage of a white Hyundai Elantra—matching Kohberger's vehicle—circling the victims' residence multiple times on the night of the murders. Additionally, cell phone data indicated that Kohberger's device connected to a tower near the crime scene 23 times in the months leading up to the incident. Investigators also uncovered disturbing online activity on Kohberger's devices, such as searches related to serial killer Ted Bundy and nonconsensual pornography, as well as images of female students in swimsuits linked to the victims or their acquaintances. The special featured interviews with individuals who had interacted with Kohberger prior to the crimes. One former graduate student recounted a peculiar text message from Kohberger following a brief meeting at a pool party, describing the message as overly formal and unsettling. The program also included conversations with friends of the victims and experts in criminology and genetics, providing context and analysis of the case. As Kohberger awaits his trial, scheduled to begin in August 2025, the episode offered viewers a comprehensive overview of the investigation and the evidence amassed against him. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Searches and selfies: Idaho college murder suspect Bryan Kohberger's online habits emerge in new details Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In Document 308, both parties in the United States v. Combs trial submitted a joint letter to Judge Arun Subramanian addressing the voir dire process, following their earlier filings (ECF Nos. 272 and 274) containing proposed questions for prospective jurors. The letter outlines areas of agreement between the prosecution and defense concerning how potential jurors should be questioned during selection. This includes standard demographic questions, prior jury service, general attitudes toward law enforcement and the justice system, and the ability to remain impartial in a high-profile case involving serious allegations. Both parties also agree on using written juror questionnaires before oral voir dire and ensuring the anonymity of jurors throughout the proceedings. However, the letter also details several points of dispute between the parties regarding specific voir dire questions. These disagreements primarily center around how directly jurors should be asked about their knowledge of Combs’ past media controversies, opinions about the #MeToo movement, and whether jurors should be specifically questioned about their views on celebrity privilege or racial bias. The defense appears to want more targeted, probing questions to detect potential prosecutorial bias, while the government pushes back on what it sees as overly leading or prejudicial language. The letter asks Judge Subramanian to resolve these disputes before voir dire begins in earnest, underscoring how both teams are already deeply invested in shaping the jury long before opening statements are heard. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a recent interview with Chris Hansen, attorney Tony Buzbee discussed the extensive legal actions against music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs. Buzbee revealed that his firm is representing over 120 individuals alleging sexual assault, exploitation, and abuse by Combs and other defendants. These cases span more than 25 years and include incidents involving minors, with some victims as young as nine years old. Buzbee emphasized the courage of these individuals in coming forward and noted that the allegations encompass a range of serious offenses, including rape and the use of controlled substances to incapacitate victims. The interview also highlighted the broader implications of these lawsuits. Buzbee indicated that the legal actions aim not only to hold Combs accountable but also to expose other powerful individuals and entities that may have enabled or benefited from the alleged misconduct. He mentioned that the lawsuits could involve various defendants, including corporate entities such as banks, pharmaceutical companies, and hotels. Buzbee stressed the importance of a thorough investigation to ensure that all responsible parties are identified and held accountable. (commercial at 15:27) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Courtney Burgess, a former associate of the late Kim Porter, has emerged as a key witness in the federal investigation against Sean "Diddy" Combs. Burgess claims that Porter, Combs' ex-girlfriend, entrusted him with 11 flash drives containing explicit videos allegedly depicting Combs engaging in sexual activities with eight celebrities, including two to three minors. He asserts that these recordings, which he presented to a grand jury in the Southern District of New York, show all participants appearing inebriated and seemingly victimized. These allegations have faced significant skepticism. Critics question the authenticity of the videos and Burgess's motives, suggesting that his claims may be attempts to gain attention or financial benefit. Legal experts have expressed doubts about the admissibility of such evidence, citing potential issues with chain of custody and verification. Combs' legal team has vehemently denied the allegations, labeling them as baseless and defamatory. They argue that Burgess's statements lack credibility and are part of a broader pattern of unfounded accusations against Combs. (commercial at 10:30) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: How One Man’s Tale of Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Sex Tapes Landed Him in Court - The New York Times Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The news regarding Kim Porter's posthumous memoir, titled Kim's Lost Words, has stirred significant controversy. The memoir, which surfaced earlier this year, allegedly comprises diary entries from Porter's time with Sean "Diddy" Combs. Within its pages, Porter describes harrowing instances of emotional and physical abuse, including allegations of Diddy assaulting her with a chair and making death threats. The memoir also details accusations involving Diddy’s infidelity, manipulation, and control throughout their relationship. The memoir, which has reportedly been found on a flash drive by Porter's friends, paints a dark picture of their relationship, stretching from the 1990s to the years leading up to her passing in 2018. While the memoir has not been officially authenticated, its release has drawn renewed scrutiny, especially in light of Diddy's recent legal troubles. However... Lawanda Lane, Kim Porter's longtime best friend and caregiver to her twin daughters with Sean "Diddy" Combs, has firmly denied the existence of any memoir authored by Porter. Lane, who lived with Porter for over two decades, stated that Porter never wrote such a manuscript and emphasized that, as someone who was with Porter daily, she would have been aware of any such writings. She also mentioned that after Porter's passing, she was responsible for organizing Porter's belongings and found no evidence of a memoir. Lane expressed skepticism about individuals claiming to possess Porter's writings, suggesting that these assertions are unfounded. She highlighted that Porter was an extremely private person and would not have documented her personal experiences in a memoir. to contact me: bobbycapucci!protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Prosecutors in Idhao are once again blasting a motion by Bryan Kohberger and his legal team to where they are attempting to change the venue of the trial. Prosecutors saythat the attempt is premature and that there is no reason why Latah county shouldn't host the trial. Let's dive in and see what's up! (commercial at 7:23) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger's 'Premature' Legal Move Blasted by Prosecutor (newsweek.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene. Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene. Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene. Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On January 23, 2025, a closed hearing was held in the case of State of Idaho v. Bryan C. Kohberger before Judge Steven Hippler. The primary focus was the defense's motion to suppress evidence obtained through Investigative Genetic Genealogy (IGG), which they argued violated Kohberger's Fourth Amendment rights. Detective Brett Payne testified that the IGG lead was treated as a tip, with further independent investigation conducted to substantiate its validity. Defense expert Dr. Leah Larkin suggested potential violations of FBI policy and genealogy database terms of service during the IGG process. However, Judge Hippler expressed skepticism regarding the defense's claims, noting the lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy for DNA left at a crime scene. Following the hearing, Judge Hippler ordered the release of a redacted transcript, balancing public interest with privacy concerns. Redactions included the names of surviving roommates and distant relatives identified through IGG. The unsealed portions provide insight into the investigative methods used and the defense's challenges to the evidence's admissibility. This development underscores the ongoing legal debates surrounding the use of IGG in criminal investigations and its implications for privacy and constitutional rights. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: KB-25-01-23-Hearing-Redacted.ecl Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs has assembled a formidable legal team to defend him against federal charges of sex trafficking, racketeering, and related offenses. Leading the defense is Marc Agnifilo, a seasoned attorney known for representing high-profile clients such as NXIVM leader Keith Raniere and "Pharma Bro" Martin Shkreli. Joining him is Teny Geragos, daughter of renowned defense lawyer Mark Geragos, bringing experience from complex federal cases. Brian Steel, recognized for his defense of rapper Young Thug in a lengthy racketeering trial, adds his expertise to the team. Xavier Donaldson, a respected New York-based attorney with a strong background in criminal defense, also plays a key role. Additionally, Alexandra Shapiro, known for her appellate work, contributes her skills to the defense strategy. The team is further supported by jury consultant Linda Moreno, who assists in selecting an impartial jury. This high-powered legal team reflects the seriousness of the charges Combs faces and his commitment to mounting a robust defense. Legal experts estimate that Combs may spend over $10 million on his defense, considering the caliber of attorneys involved and the complexity of the case. Each lawyer brings a unique set of skills and experience, aiming to challenge the prosecution's narrative and protect Combs' interests throughout the trial. The defense is expected to scrutinize the credibility of witnesses and question the interpretation of evidence, including surveillance footage and testimonies from alleged victims. As the trial unfolds, this legal team will be instrumental in navigating the intricate legal landscape and advocating on behalf of Combs. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Sean 'Diddy' Combs legal team: Here are the lawyers defending hip-hop mogul - ABC News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.