The Moscow Murders and More

Adria Sheri English, a former go-go dancer, has made serious allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs, claiming that she was forced to participate in sexual activities at his infamous "freak-off" parties. English, who has filed a lawsuit against Diddy, also revealed a list of high-profile celebrities she saw at these gatherings. Among the notable figures she claims were present are Donald Trump, Diana Ross (with her underage son Evan), Paris Hilton, Ja Rule, Busta Rhymes, and Reverend Al Sharpton. English expressed surprise at seeing some of these individuals, particularly Reverend Al Sharpton, at such controversial events. English alleges that while these celebrities attended the main parties, the "freak-offs" took place in secluded rooms away from the main events, suggesting that many of the partygoers may not have been aware of the more sinister activities happening behind closed doors. English also claimed that Diddy secretly recorded these encounters for potential blackmail purposes, further complicating the accusations against him. Courtney Burgess, a witness in the federal investigation against Sean "Diddy" Combs, testified before a grand jury that he possesses 11 flash drives containing sex tapes allegedly involving Combs and eight celebrities, including two to three minors. Burgess claimed these tapes were provided to him by Combs' ex-girlfriend, Kim Porter, before her death in 2018. He described the individuals in the tapes as appearing inebriated and suggested they were victims of Combs' actions.. Additionally, Burgess stated that he has seen an unedited version of a memoir written by Porter, which contains detailed accounts of Combs' alleged physical and sexual violence. He mentioned that he was contacted by agents from the Department of Homeland Security and later subpoenaed by a federal grand jury to provide all relevant electronic devices. Burgess's testimony adds to the mounting allegations against Combs, who is currently facing charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. Also... During a recent interagency operation at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn, authorities seized drugs, homemade weapons, and electronic devices. The operation, involving the Bureau of Prisons, the Justice Department's inspector general, and other law enforcement agencies, aimed to address safety and security concerns within the facility. Officials stated that the sweep was part of a broader initiative and not in response to any specific threat or individual, including current detainee Sean "Diddy" Combs. The raid calls into question the point of the OIG report into Jeffrey Epstein's death, considering how many of the same issues are still present, even after the BOP was made aware of the issues. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean Combs, also known as Puff Daddy or P. Diddy, was involved in a highly publicized shooting incident on December 27, 1999. The incident occurred at Club New York in Manhattan, New York City. The shooting took place during a confrontation between individuals associated with Sean Combs and another group, which included rapper Jamal "Shyne" Barrow and his associates. The altercation reportedly began after a dispute over a spilled drink escalated into a physical confrontation. Shots were fired inside the club, resulting in injuries to three individuals, including Natania Reuben, a clubgoer, and Julius Jones, a member of Combs' entourage. Combs and his then-girlfriend, actress-singer Jennifer Lopez, were present at the club during the incident but were unharmed. Following the shooting, Sean Combs, his bodyguard, Anthony "Wolf" Jones, and rapper Shyne were arrested. Combs was charged with illegal possession of a firearm, as well as bribery charges for allegedly offering his driver, Wardel Fenderson, money to claim ownership of the weapon found at the scene. Shyne was charged with attempted murder, assault, and reckless endangerment. Followed By: During the trial, the prosecution argued that Combs had brandished a gun during the altercation and that Shyne had fired shots in the club. However, Combs maintained his innocence, claiming that he never possessed or fired a weapon during the incident. The case drew significant media attention and raised questions about celebrity involvement in criminal activity. In March 2001, Sean Combs was acquitted of all charges related to the shooting. However, his bodyguard, Anthony Jones, was found guilty of attempted assault and weapons charges. Shyne was convicted of assault, reckless endangerment, and gun possession and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. In this episode, we hear from Natania Reuben who says she is positive that it was Diddy who shot her and the extrodinary lengths she says she's willing to go to in order to prove her allegations. In a letter to the court, prosecutors strongly opposed Sean "Diddy" Combs' bail appeal, emphasizing his long history of witness intimidation and violent behavior. They argued that no conditions of bail, including his proposed house arrest in his luxurious Miami home, would prevent him from tampering with witnesses. Prosecutors cited multiple instances of abuse and threats to victims, including testimony from more than 50 witnesses and evidence from raids on Combs' properties. They highlighted the severity of the charges, which could lead to life imprisonment if convicted​ (commercial at 9:53) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to the government's declarations submitted on January 17, 2025 (Dkt. 131), Sean Combs’ legal team reiterates their arguments in favor of his Motion for a Hearing, Suppression, and Other Relief (Dkt. 97). The defense asserts that the government’s submission fails to address critical procedural and substantive issues related to the evidence in question. Specifically, they highlight inconsistencies and potential constitutional violations in the methods used to obtain evidence against Mr. Combs, calling into question its admissibility. The defense maintains that these deficiencies warrant a full evidentiary hearing to safeguard Mr. Combs’ rights under due process. Additionally, the defense emphasizes that suppression of certain evidence is not only appropriate but necessary to ensure a fair trial. They argue that the government’s declarations lack sufficient justification to refute claims of improper conduct and overreach by law enforcement. By filing this response, Mr. Combs’ counsel seeks to underscore the importance of addressing these legal flaws promptly and thoroughly, urging the court to grant the requested relief to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.135.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

As the trial of Bryan Kohberger continues to loom, we are learning more about what is going on behind the scenes in the courtroom. In this episode, we take a look at the 60 new redacted warrants that have been filed to the courts docket and what signifigance they might hold moving forward. (commercial at 10:19) to contact me: bobycapucci@protonmai.com Police issued 60 warrants to companies like Doordash and Tinder while investigating Bryan Kohberger | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In our latest dive into the court filings, we take a look at the Door Dash warrant and the other documents pertaining to it. (commercial at 7:35) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 030723 Order to Seal Redact - DoorDash Inc.pdf (idaho.gov) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Steve Goncalves, the father of Kaylee Goncalves spoke with CNN about the murder of his daughter and the effect it is having on him and his family during the holidays. He also touched a variety of other issues about the murders and the investigation that is currently underway. (commercial at 7:28) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 'We're struggling': Dad of Idaho murder victim reflects on lack of suspect, five weeks after murders - KXLY Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Our dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the Ethan Chapin Meta Warrant (Meta 2) (commercial at 9:51) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 030723+Order+to+Seal++Redact+-+Meta+Platforms+Inc+2.pdf (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The dive into the court documents continues in this episode as we are taking a looking at the T-Mobile warrant for the numbers that end in 4782 and 4818. (commercial at 9:17) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 071323+Order+to+Seal+and+Redact+-+T-Mobile.pdf (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the prosecution submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian alerting the court to anticipated evidentiary and procedural issues related to the upcoming testimony of Lance Jimenez, a key government witness expected to take the stand as early as Monday, May 27. The letter serves as a preemptive notice to streamline courtroom proceedings and mitigate potential objections or delays during Jimenez’s examination. The government likely outlines the scope of Jimenez’s testimony, which may touch on sensitive or contested areas, and provides legal justification for the inclusion of certain pieces of evidence or lines of questioning they intend to pursue. The filing also appears to be a tactical move to prevent surprises and bolster the admissibility of what could be pivotal testimony in establishing patterns of behavior or corroborating other witnesses’ claims. By addressing these matters in advance, prosecutors aim to minimize disruptions during trial and reinforce the integrity of Jimenez’s testimony within the broader evidentiary framework. The letter underscores the government's intent to methodically build its case while anticipating and countering defense efforts to exclude or diminish the impact of Jimenez’s statements. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.354.0_2.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this letter to Judge Subramanian, Sean Combs's legal team opposes a request made by Ms. Cassie Ventura to block a proposed Rule 17 subpoena that would compel her to produce certain documents. The defense argues that Ventura’s objections lack merit and that the subpoena is neither “unreasonable nor oppressive.” Instead, they maintain that the materials requested are relevant and potentially critical to Combs’s defense in the ongoing federal criminal case, which includes charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. The defense further contends that Ventura’s attempt to avoid producing these documents undermines the fairness of the legal process. They assert that the subpoena complies with procedural standards and is narrowly tailored to obtain specific information tied to Ventura’s claims and testimony. As such, the letter urges the Court to approve, or “so-order,” the subpoena, allowing the defense to access documents they believe may challenge Ventura’s credibility or support Combs’s case. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.370.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the afternoon of Day 13 of Sean "Diddy" Combs's federal trial, "Mia," a former assistant testifying under a pseudonym, faced cross-examination by the defense. Combs's attorney, Brian Steel, presented jurors with Mia's past social media posts and a scrapbook she created for Combs's 45th birthday, which included affectionate messages like "I love you forever." Steel aimed to challenge Mia's allegations of abuse by highlighting these positive depictions of their relationship. Mia responded that these gestures were made under psychological duress, explaining that she was in a "very confusing" situation and feared for her safety, stating that creating the scrapbook was "a lot more complicated on all levels." Further questioning focused on Mia's emotional state after being dismissed from Combs's company in 2016. Text messages presented in court revealed her expressing feelings of devastation and heartbreak, describing her life as "over" and stating she was "going to kill" herself. Mia explained that working for Combs was her entire world, and the sudden loss left her feeling lost and betrayed. When asked directly whether she had fabricated any part of her testimony, Mia firmly stated, "What I said is true. I have not lied to anyone at all." The court adjourned for the day, with Mia's cross-examination set to continue on Monday. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: May 30, 2025 - Day 13 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Gene Deal, Sean "Diddy" Combs's former bodyguard, alleged in a recent interview that Combs paid his ex-girlfriend Gina Huynh approximately $2 million, along with providing her housing and educational support, to dissuade her from testifying in his federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial. Deal claimed that Huynh, believed to be "Victim 3" in the indictment, became a "hostile witness" after accepting these benefits, leading to her disappearance from the witness list. Despite being subpoenaed, prosecutors reportedly struggled to locate her, raising concerns about witness tampering and the integrity of the judicial process. Meanwhile... In a recent prison interview, Marion "Suge" Knight, the incarcerated former CEO of Death Row Records, publicly urged his longtime rival Sean "Diddy" Combs to testify in his ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial. Knight suggested that by taking the stand, Combs could "humanize his old self" and potentially sway the jury's perception in his favor. He emphasized that Combs's silence might be interpreted as fear, stating, "If they keep him sitting down, it's like he's scared to face the music." Knight encouraged Combs to "tell his truth," implying that honesty and personal accountability could be pivotal in the trial's outcome. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 'Brainwashed': Diddy's Former Bodyguard Says Gina Huynh Was Paid Millions To Stay Silent Suge Knight tells Diddy to take the stand in effort to ‘humanize’ himself | The Independent Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to the government's declarations submitted on January 17, 2025 (Dkt. 131), Sean Combs’ legal team reiterates their arguments in favor of his Motion for a Hearing, Suppression, and Other Relief (Dkt. 97). The defense asserts that the government’s submission fails to address critical procedural and substantive issues related to the evidence in question. Specifically, they highlight inconsistencies and potential constitutional violations in the methods used to obtain evidence against Mr. Combs, calling into question its admissibility. The defense maintains that these deficiencies warrant a full evidentiary hearing to safeguard Mr. Combs’ rights under due process. Additionally, the defense emphasizes that suppression of certain evidence is not only appropriate but necessary to ensure a fair trial. They argue that the government’s declarations lack sufficient justification to refute claims of improper conduct and overreach by law enforcement. By filing this response, Mr. Combs’ counsel seeks to underscore the importance of addressing these legal flaws promptly and thoroughly, urging the court to grant the requested relief to uphold the integrity of the judicial process. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.135.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to Defendant Shawn Carter's motion for sanctions, the Plaintiff argues that the motion is both frivolous and procedurally improper. The Plaintiff contends that Carter's reliance on a single television interview to challenge the veracity of events that occurred twenty-four years ago, when the Plaintiff was thirteen, does not substantiate a claim for sanctions. They emphasize that discrepancies in recollection, especially concerning traumatic events from decades prior, are common and do not equate to bad faith or warrant sanctions. Furthermore, the Plaintiff highlights that Carter's attempt to bypass the mandatory twenty-one-day safe harbor provision under Rule 11 lacks legal precedent and justification, rendering his request to expedite the filing deadline to one day as unfounded. The Plaintiff also underscores that expecting a sexual assault victim, particularly one who was a minor at the time and has disclosed being autistic, to have precise recall of all details is unreasonable. They reference New York courts' recognition that survivors of childhood sexual abuse may not remember exact dates or times, which does not invalidate their claims. The Plaintiff asserts that Carter's threats of immediate sanctions are intended to intimidate and silence the Plaintiff and other potential claimants, constituting an abuse of the judicial process. They conclude by urging the court to deny Carter's motion, stating that it lacks substantive merit and is procedurally defective. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Microsoft Word - NYC-#6394976-v8A-Draft_Rule_11_Opp__MoL Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In response to Defendant Shawn Carter's motion for sanctions, the Plaintiff argues that the motion is both frivolous and procedurally improper. The Plaintiff contends that Carter's reliance on a single television interview to challenge the veracity of events that occurred twenty-four years ago, when the Plaintiff was thirteen, does not substantiate a claim for sanctions. They emphasize that discrepancies in recollection, especially concerning traumatic events from decades prior, are common and do not equate to bad faith or warrant sanctions. Furthermore, the Plaintiff highlights that Carter's attempt to bypass the mandatory twenty-one-day safe harbor provision under Rule 11 lacks legal precedent and justification, rendering his request to expedite the filing deadline to one day as unfounded. The Plaintiff also underscores that expecting a sexual assault victim, particularly one who was a minor at the time and has disclosed being autistic, to have precise recall of all details is unreasonable. They reference New York courts' recognition that survivors of childhood sexual abuse may not remember exact dates or times, which does not invalidate their claims. The Plaintiff asserts that Carter's threats of immediate sanctions are intended to intimidate and silence the Plaintiff and other potential claimants, constituting an abuse of the judicial process. They conclude by urging the court to deny Carter's motion, stating that it lacks substantive merit and is procedurally defective. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Microsoft Word - NYC-#6394976-v8A-Draft_Rule_11_Opp__MoL Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 4-17-23 Recently Idaho passed a law that legalized death by firing squad in the event that chemicals used in the cocktail given to the condemned is not available. With several high profile cases working their way through the system in Idaho, including the murder trial of Bryan Kohberger, legal experts are providing more context on the state of Idaho and their history with the death penalty. In this episode, we take a look at some of that history and hear what the experts have to say about the firing squad being utilized at some point in the future in the case of Bryan Kohberger. (commercial at 8:56) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/crime/article274244650.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Crime scene staging refers to the intentional alteration or manipulation of a crime scene to mislead or throw off an investigation. This may include moving or rearranging evidence, planting false evidence, or creating a false scenario. Crime scene staging can be done in an attempt to conceal the true circumstances of a crime, such as making a murder appear to be a suicide or an accident. It is a form of criminal deception that can compromise the integrity of an investigation and obstruct justice. In this episode, we explore the possibility that the alleged Murderer Bryan Kohberger left the knife sheath there on purpose and if so, why would he do such a thing? (commercial at 6:57) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho murders: How does criminology student leave crime scene with blood-dripping knife? | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Gag orders, also known as prior restraint orders, are restrictions on speech or the press that are imposed by the government or the courts. The constitutionality of gag orders depends on the specific circumstances of each case and the specific restrictions imposed.In general, the First Amendment of the US Constitution protects freedom of speech and of the press, and restrictions on speech are subject to strict scrutiny by the courts. However, under certain circumstances, the government may impose restrictions on speech in order to protect important interests, such as national security, the integrity of the judicial process, or the privacy rights of individuals.In such cases, the courts will balance the government's interests against the First Amendment rights of the speaker or the press. If the restrictions are deemed to be narrowly tailored and the least restrictive means of achieving the government's interest, they may be upheld as constitutional. However, if the restrictions are overly broad or unnecessarily restrictive, they may be struck down as unconstitutional. In this episode we get the decision from the supreme court who has ruled that the gag order will stay in place. (commercial at 7:22) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho murders: Court denies request to lift gag order in case of Bryan Kohberger, man accused of killing 4 college students - CBS News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger and his legal team have asked the court multiple times to stay proceedings. Judge Judge has so far denied their request and now the prosecution is objecting to the second request to stay the proceedings. In this episode we dive into that objection in full. (commercial at 9:47) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 081123-Objection-to-Defendants-Second-Motion-to-Stay-Proceedings.pdf (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 12-20-22 On this edition of the morning update, we dive right back into the headlines from overnight and see where things currently stand as of this morning. (commercial at 7:07) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho college murders update: Moscow police say ‘progress’ has been made | The Independent Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.