The Moscow Murders and More

From the archives: 5-28-22 In the state of Idaho, a capital punishment case refers to a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of a crime that carries the possibility of receiving the death penalty as a punishment. Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the legal imposition of death as a penalty for a serious crime.Here is a summary of what typically constitutes a capital punishment case in the state of Idaho: In this episode, we take look at the chances for a capital punishment case against Bryan Kohberger and if the proseuction is prepared to go down that road. (commercial at 9:20) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger Prosecutor Likely to Push for Death Penalty: Legal Expert (newsweek.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The family of murdered Kaylee Goncalves have been very clear with what they think should happen if Bryan Kohberger is convicted of murder. They think that he should be put to death. Not only that, they think that his execution shouldn't be by lethal injection. Instead, they want him to face a firing squad. (commercial at 9:00) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Family of Idaho murder victim Kaylee Goncalves want 'killer' Bryan Kohberger to face a firing squad | The US Sun (the-sun.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 6-28-23 Judge John Judge warned the media during yesterdays hearing about zooming in on Bryan Kohberger during the proceedings. He pointed to the Lori Vallow trial for reference and noted that if the Media wants to keep the cameras in the courtroom, they are going to have to follow the rules as they are stated. Considering the interest surrounding this case, the Judge feels that it would be prejudicial to keep the camera locked on Kohberger. We also dive a littler deeper into the hearing from yesterday and discuss what went down in the courtroom in Latah County. (commercial at 8:53) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger judge refers to Lori Vallow case as suit-clad Idaho murders suspect appears in court | The Independent Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the morning of Tuesday, June 3, 2025, at Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, former hotel security supervisor Eddy Garcia testified about a 2016 incident involving Combs and his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Garcia recounted that Combs paid $100,000 in cash to obtain surveillance footage showing him assaulting Ventura in a Los Angeles hotel hallway. Garcia, who was earning $10.50 per hour at the time, described signing a confidentiality agreement under threat of a $1 million penalty and claimed he never deposited the money to avoid leaving a paper trail. The video, which later resurfaced, is a key piece of evidence in the government's case, supporting allegations that Combs used threats and his wealth to coerce women into participating in sex acts during events known as "freak-offs" at various hotels . Garcia's testimony also included details about Combs' attempts to suppress the video, including multiple conversations in which Combs expressed fear that the footage would ruin his career. Garcia stated that Combs referred to him as "Eddy my angel" and emphasized the importance of keeping the incident confidential. The defense contends that Ventura’s participation in the events was consensual, while prosecutors argue that Combs' actions fit into a broader pattern of abuse and coercion. Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges including sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted, he could face a life sentence . to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: (2) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial continues with investigation into Cassie Ventura relationship | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, the plaintiff—identified as John Doe—opposes the defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil lawsuit against Sean Combs and a series of related business entities. Doe’s opposition argues that the complaint sufficiently alleges multiple counts of sex trafficking, battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress under both federal and state law. The document asserts that the claims are not time-barred under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) or New York’s Adult Survivors Act, and that the plaintiff has presented enough factual detail to meet the pleading standards required by federal court. He alleges that Combs used his vast network of companies and affiliates to facilitate, cover up, and enable repeated acts of sexual abuse and psychological coercion. Doe also challenges the defense’s attempts to downplay Combs’ alleged role in the abuse by arguing that his status as a corporate executive does not shield him from personal liability. The opposition brief emphasizes that Combs maintained direct control over the events in question, and that his affiliated entities—ranging from Bad Boy Entertainment to Combs Global—were tools used to recruit, exploit, and silence victims. The plaintiff’s legal team contends that discovery should proceed so the full extent of Combs’ alleged criminal enterprise can be examined through the civil process. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.630243.62.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Music journalist Touré has publicly criticized Jaguar Wright for spreading unsubstantiated claims about Sean "Diddy" Combs, particularly her assertions of rescuing women from his alleged "freak-off" parties. In a TikTok video, Touré questioned the credibility of Wright's statements, noting that these gatherings reportedly involved only Combs, his then-girlfriend Cassie, and male sex workers, leaving no evidence of Wright's involvement or of her aiding any victims. He emphasized that these events were intimate affairs held in hotel rooms, not large-scale parties where someone could intervene unnoticed. Touré has previously labeled Wright a conspiracy theorist, especially after her unfounded allegations against Jay-Z and Beyoncé on Piers Morgan's show, which led to legal action and a public apology from Morgan. He contends that Wright's claims lack factual basis and contribute to the spread of misinformation surrounding Combs' ongoing legal issues. Defense attorney Brian Steel faced significant criticism for his aggressive cross-examination of "Mia," a key witness in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial. Over two days, Steel's questioning was described by prosecutors as "harassing" and "humiliating," with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing him of yelling, sarcasm, and suggesting Mia was lying. The judge, while not finding the tone overtly inappropriate, cautioned Steel against being repetitive and noted concerns about his approach. Steel's tactics, including highlighting Mia's past affectionate messages to Combs and suggesting financial motives, were seen by some as potentially deterring other victims from coming forward. Despite the intense scrutiny, Mia maintained her allegations, explaining that her past communications were a result of being "brainwashed" during her employment with Combs . to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Touré Slams Jaguar Wright For Claims About Diddy's Alleged "Feak-Offs" Sean 'Diddy' Combs' 'sarcastic' defense attorneys slammed for 'harassing' sex assault accuser with 'humiliating' questions Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the afternoon of Monday, June 2, 2025, during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, the prosecution's key witness, known by the pseudonym "Mia," concluded her testimony. Under cross-examination, defense attorney Brian Steel highlighted affectionate messages Mia had sent to Combs after her employment ended in 2017, including a 2019 text describing a dream where Combs rescued her from R. Kelly. Mia explained that she was "brainwashed" during that period, describing her relationship with Combs as one where "the highs were really high and the lows were really low," leading to confusion in trusting her instincts Following Mia's testimony, the prosecution called Sylvia Oken, a custodian at The Beverly Hills Hotel, who testified about additional cleaning fees charged to Combs' hotel account, including a $500 charge for "oil damage." Oken noted that Combs often used aliases such as "Phillip Pines" during his stays . The trial, now in its fourth week, continues with Combs facing multiple charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy. If convicted, he could face a life sentence. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a letter to Judge Subramanian regarding United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government addresses expected defense objections to specific aspects of testimony from Capricorn Clark. The defense is seeking to exclude Clark’s statements related to a 2004 incident in which she was allegedly kidnapped and threatened, as well as testimony concerning statements made to her by Cassie Ventura about an alleged assault committed by Sean Combs. The Government argues that both portions of Clark’s testimony should be admitted. They contend the threats made during the kidnapping are directly relevant to demonstrating the scope of the enterprise’s coercive tactics and pattern of intimidation, central to the RICO charges. Additionally, Ventura’s statements to Clark regarding abuse by Combs are presented as corroborative evidence of the defendant's conduct and the atmosphere of fear maintained within his inner circle. The Government maintains that these statements are admissible under established evidentiary rules, including hearsay exceptions, and are critical to establishing context and intent. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.367.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Parham v. Combs et al (Case No. 3:24-cv-07191-RFL), plaintiff Ashley Parham filed an amended complaint against defendants Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram,Druski, Odell Beckham and Shane Pearce, alleging personal injury claims related to assault, libel, and slander under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The original complaint was filed on October 15, 2024, in the Northern District of California, with Parham seeking a jury trial to address these allegations. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Parham complaint FINAL-3 Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Parham v. Combs et al (Case No. 3:24-cv-07191-RFL), plaintiff Ashley Parham filed an amended complaint against defendants Sean Combs, Kristina Khorram,Druski, Odell Beckham and Shane Pearce, alleging personal injury claims related to assault, libel, and slander under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. The original complaint was filed on October 15, 2024, in the Northern District of California, with Parham seeking a jury trial to address these allegations. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Parham complaint FINAL-3 Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The climb to the top of the mountain of court filings continues in this episode as we take a look at the redcated tinder warrant (commercial at 9:37) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 030723+Order+to+Seal++Redact+-+Match+Group+LLC+4.pdf (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The family of Kaylee Goncalves has said that they are putting together some fundraisers to help them raise money to offer a reward for information leading to the arrest of the person responsible for her death. The authorities have said that they are still getting plenty of tips and do not think a reward is necessary at this point. Let's take a look. (commercial at 8:54) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.foxnews.com/us/idaho-victims-family-raising-funds-reward-money-campus-murder-mystery-enters-week-4-no-arrests Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this episode, we continue our exploration of the court filings by taking a look at the Xana Kernodle Apple warrant. (commercial at 9:06) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho Judicial Cases of Interest Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Steve and Kristi Goncalves have suffered a tragedy that nobody should ever have to suffer and yet they continue to push forward as they seek justice for their daughter, Kaylee. As we hit the one year mark, the Goncalves sat down with KHQ for an interview. In this episode, we hear from Kaylee's parents about their new normal in the wake of the murder of Kaylee and what they are hoping for with Bryan Kohberger's trial and the continued pursuit of justice. (commercial at 9:16) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Goncalves family persists a year after daughter Kaylee was murdered | News | khq.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Capital murder trials are typically more lengthy and complex than other criminal trials due to several reasons: While all that might be true, it doesn't make it any easier for the Goncalves family, who continue to question the process and the many, many delays. In this episode, we hear from the Goncalves family who share their feelings on the latest salvo of court filings to hit the docket. (commercial at 9:08) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: ‘This case is turning into a hamster wheel’: Family of slain University of Idaho student frustrated at pace of murder trial | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On Monday, June 2, 2025, during the ongoing federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs, his former assistant, testifying under the pseudonym "Mia," continued her cross-examination. Defense attorney Brian Steel presented the jury with messages and a 2013 video in which Mia expressed admiration for Combs, referring to him as "one of the biggest inspirations in my life." Steel questioned the credibility of Mia's allegations by highlighting these past expressions of affection. Mia responded by explaining that her actions were a result of psychological manipulation and abuse, stating she was "brainwashed" and constantly sought Combs' approval due to the emotionally abusive environment she was in. She emphasized that despite her past messages, her courtroom testimony about the alleged assaults was truthful . The prosecution objected to the defense's line of questioning, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey accusing Steel of conducting a "humiliating" cross-examination that bordered on harassment. Comey argued that such tactics could deter other victims from coming forward. Judge Arun Subramanian acknowledged the concerns but stated he had not observed any misconduct, allowing the cross-examination to proceed. Mia's testimony is central to the prosecution's case, which alleges that Combs operated a criminal enterprise involving abuse, coercion, and exploitation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, and faces a potential life sentence if convicted . to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: (1) Sean 'Diddy' Combs trial live updates: Ex-assistant 'Mia' resumes testimony after sexual assault claims Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Crystal McKinney, a former model, has filed lawsuits against both Sean "Diddy" Combs and Harvey Weinstein, alleging separate incidents of sexual assault in 2003. In her lawsuit against Combs, filed in May 2024, McKinney claims that after meeting him at a Men's Fashion Week event, he invited her to his New York City recording studio under the pretense of discussing her modeling career. There, she alleges he provided her with alcohol and marijuana, which she believes was laced with another substance. McKinney asserts that Combs pressured her to consume more substances and, once she was heavily intoxicated, led her into a bathroom where he forced her to perform oral sex. She later woke up in a cab with no recollection of how she got there and has since experienced ongoing emotional trauma, including depression and a suicide attempt. In a separate case, McKinney filed an amended lawsuit in May 2025 against Harvey Weinstein, alleging that he sexually assaulted her and a friend in a Manhattan hotel room in 2003. According to the complaint, a modeling agency executive arranged a meeting between McKinney and Weinstein at a lounge, which later moved to his hotel room under the guise of discussing acting opportunities. Once there, Weinstein allegedly plied them with alcohol, groped McKinney, and coerced both women into non-consensual sexual acts, including rape. McKinney claims that she and her friend complied out of fear of retaliation and that the incident led to long-term psychological distress. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Crystal McKinney adds Harvey Weinstein to lawsuit months after Diddy claims | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The United States government is steadily building a case that positions Sean "Diddy" Combs as the central figure in a sprawling criminal enterprise, using testimony from former employees, associates, and victims to demonstrate a sustained pattern of abuse, coercion, and organized misconduct. Witnesses like Capricorn Clark and Dawn Richard have described not only Diddy’s violent and controlling behavior but also how a network of loyal aides and enablers helped facilitate and conceal his actions. The government is drawing a direct connection between Combs’ personal vendettas—such as retaliating against Kid Cudi over Cassie—and the systemic use of threats, intimidation, and force to control women and silence dissenters. These accounts contribute to a larger RICO narrative, portraying Combs not as a lone abuser but as the orchestrator of an enterprise that functioned through coordinated illegal acts for his personal and professional gain. What sets this case apart is the way the prosecution is using RICO statutes—typically reserved for organized crime syndicates—to frame Combs' actions as part of a calculated, multi-year operation involving multiple individuals and entities under his control. The government has introduced testimony linking Combs to alleged acts of kidnapping, sexual violence, witness intimidation, and financial manipulation, often carried out with the assistance of subordinates who were rewarded for their loyalty and silence. As more witnesses corroborate each other's accounts and the pattern of behavior becomes harder to dismiss as coincidence or isolated incidents, the prosecution is tightening its argument that Combs’ empire wasn’t just a music business—it was a command center for a criminal enterprise. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: A 'criminal enterprise' may be emerging in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs’s motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense’s request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include. The government further asserts that Combs’s arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes’s expert contributions. They describe the defense’s motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes’s testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court’s prior validation of its admissibility. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, the government strongly opposes Sean Combs’s motion to strike the expert testimony of Dr. Dawn Hughes, a clinical and forensic psychologist who previously took the stand. The government argues that the defense’s request is both untimely and baseless, noting it was filed three days after Dr. Hughes had already testified. The prosecution contends that Dr. Hughes's testimony was properly admitted after thorough litigation and judicial review, and that the court had already placed clear boundaries on what her expert analysis could include. The government further asserts that Combs’s arguments lack legal merit and ignore prior court rulings that carefully delineated the scope of Dr. Hughes’s expert contributions. They describe the defense’s motion as an effort to relitigate settled matters without presenting new or compelling justification. As such, the government urges the court to reject the motion to strike and allow Dr. Hughes’s testimony to remain part of the trial record, emphasizing its relevance and the court’s prior validation of its admissibility. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.372.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.