The Moscow Murders and More

In the case United States v. Combs, 24-cr-542 (AS), Sean Combs’ legal team submitted a letter to Judge Arun Subramanian outlining key evidentiary concerns ahead of upcoming testimony and formally requesting that certain previously admitted evidence be stricken from the record. The defense reiterated its objections to testimony that it contends is inadmissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence, particularly on grounds of hearsay, undue prejudice, and lack of probative value. This includes evidence that the court initially allowed over defense objections, which the Combs team argues unfairly damages their client’s right to a fair trial by introducing speculative or inflammatory material not directly tied to the core charges. Additionally, the filing serves as a preemptive move to frame the admissibility debate for future witness testimony, suggesting that the defense anticipates more problematic evidence may surface as the trial progresses. By submitting this letter, Combs’ attorneys are both preserving the record for potential appellate review and actively seeking to limit the scope of the prosecution’s narrative strategy, which they claim leans heavily on prejudicial anecdotes rather than legally relevant proof. The defense is pushing the court to more rigorously enforce evidentiary standards to prevent what it views as a trial driven by character assassination rather than criminal facts. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.352.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean "Diddy" Combs is facing three new lawsuits from anonymous male plaintiffs who allege drugging and sexual assault incidents between 2019 and 2022. The lawsuits describe encounters where Combs allegedly provided the men with spiked drinks, leading to unconsciousness and subsequent sexual assaults at various locations, including his East Hampton residence and Manhattan hotels. One plaintiff claims he was assaulted after being drugged during an afterparty at a Manhattan hotel, with parts of the incident reportedly recorded. Another plaintiff, a long-time employee of Combs, alleges he was assaulted during a meeting at a Times Square hotel to discuss unpaid compensation. The third accuser states he was drugged and raped by Combs and associates at a 2020 party at the East Hampton property. Combs’ legal team has denied the allegations, calling them fabricated and expressing intent to challenge the claims and seek sanctions against the plaintiffs’ attorneys. These lawsuits add to a series of legal challenges for Combs, who is also facing federal charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. Attorney Thomas Giuffra, representing the three plaintiffs, revealed that over 60 individuals have come forward with similar allegations, though only these three cases have been filed after vetting. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and jury trials, with their identities kept confidential due to safety concerns and fears of intimidation. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the federal charges and awaits a trial scheduled for May 2025. Sean "Diddy" Combs, currently detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering, has been granted access to a laptop to review discovery materials for his defense. This decision follows his legal team's complaints about restrictive conditions hindering his trial preparation. Initially, Combs' attorneys highlighted delays in providing the laptop and objected to limitations on its use, such as restricted hours and designated locations within the facility. They argued these constraints were "untenable" and impeded his ability to collaborate effectively with his defense team. In response, Judge Arun Subramanian ruled that Combs should have daily access to a laptop pre-loaded with discovery materials. The device is configured solely for viewing documents, without capabilities for note-taking or internet access, to maintain security protocols. Combs is permitted to use the laptop in his jail unit from 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM daily, with any additional access requiring further discussion with the government. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Diddy judge sparks uproar by granting 'rapist' rapper's diva jail request | Daily Mail Online Diddy's 'perverted three word excuse when victim woke up while being raped' | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging that Combs sexually assaulted her at a charity event he co-sponsored in 1991. The plaintiff sought to proceed anonymously, citing the sensitive nature of the allegations and potential harm if her identity were disclosed. Initially, the court granted a temporary order allowing her to proceed under a pseudonym, pending further review. Upon subsequent evaluation, the court applied the ten-factor balancing test from Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant to determine whether the plaintiff could continue anonymously. The court found that while the case involved sensitive personal matters, other factors—such as the significant public interest in the proceedings, potential prejudice to the defendants, and the plaintiff's ability to present her case without anonymity—outweighed the arguments for anonymity. Consequently, the court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, emphasizing the importance of transparency and public access in judicial proceedings. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.633975.44.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In another move that signals that the state of Idaho is going for the highest penalty available to them when it concerns prosecuting Bryan Kohberger, the prosecution has reached out to the Attorney Generals office in Idaho and asked for assistance. That assistance, will come in the form of two more seasoned prosecutors who will help bolster the prosecutions team as they inch closer to trial. In this episode we take a look at the two new prosecutors that were added and what it might mean moving forward in the trial. (commercial at 6:12) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger Case Gets New Prosecutors (newsweek.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 11-29-22 Aaron Snell, the Spokesperson for the investigation in Moscow gave an interview to the dailymail and clarified a few points while explaining why the investigators are conducting the investigation in the manner that they are. Let's dive in! (commercial at 9:35) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11477433/Idaho-police-say-corroborate-one-victim-stalker.html Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 7-8-23 The state of Idaho is not a state that is quick to execute people who have been found guilty of capital crimes. Just ask Gerald Pizzuto who has been sitting on death row for decades. It has cost the state of Idaho over 1.5 million dollars to house this man and deal with his plethora of medical ailments and now the question is being raised concerning Kohberger: Just how much could it cost to house him on death row if he is found guilty? Let's take a look. (commercial at 7:23) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Bryan Kohberger death penalty would cost $1M more than life in prison: report | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Yesterday we learned that the FBI was headed back to the house located at 1122 King Road so that they could gather more evidence to help them build models of the house and other evidence that will help the prosecution slam the door home, they hope, on Bryan Kohberger. In this episode, we get some more details about what the FBI is doing at the house, how long they're expected to be at the house, and what it might mean moving forward. (commercial at 6:32) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: FBI returns to home of Idaho student killings for evidence | Idaho Statesman Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a move that pretty much has come out of right field, the FBI has returned to the house where the murders in Moscow took place after turning the house over to the University and stating that their investigation at the home was completed. The home was set to be torn down, but after an outrcy from the parents, the university shelved its plans to raze the home to the ground until further notice. It would seem that that was a good idea as there is obviously still evidence at the home that the FBI has deemed relevant. (commercial at 6:31) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho college killings: FBI returns to house amid Kohberger case delay (newsnationnow.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger’s defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment rights. Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man’s life hangs in the balance. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Bryan Kohberger’s defense team filed a motion to continue his trial, citing the immense complexity of the case and the need for more time to prepare a constitutionally sound defense in a potential death penalty proceeding. Central to their argument was the overwhelming volume of discovery—spanning thousands of documents, extensive digital forensics, and controversial investigative techniques like investigative genetic genealogy (IGG)—that still required analysis. The defense stressed that critical forensic testing, alternative suspect leads, and expert witness coordination were all in progress but incomplete, and that proceeding without adequate preparation time would severely undermine Kohberger’s Sixth Amendment rights. Additionally, the motion addressed a new and pressing concern: recent unauthorized leaks of sensitive case information to the media, which the defense claims have irreparably tainted the jury pool and complicated trial readiness. The leaked material included confidential investigative details and potential evidentiary matters that had not yet been addressed in court, prompting fears that media exposure could bias potential jurors and violate Kohberger’s right to a fair trial. The defense argued that the leaks not only compromised the integrity of the case but also necessitated further investigation into their source and impact, requiring additional time to file proper motions and possibly request venue changes. Together, these issues formed the basis of their request for a delay, asserting that justice demands a careful, deliberate approach—especially when a man’s life hangs in the balance. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 052025+Defendants+Motion+to+Continue.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal team filed a motion to strike the testimony of Scott Mescudi, known professionally as Kid Cudi, after his appearance in the federal criminal trial elicited explosive allegations. Cudi testified that Combs once threatened to blow up his car due to Cudi’s past romantic involvement with Cassie Ventura, a key accuser in the case. Days later, Cudi's car mysteriously exploded in his driveway—an incident that, according to the prosecution, underscored a pattern of intimidation and retaliation by Combs. Diddy's defense argued that this testimony was both prejudicial and speculative, asserting that no direct evidence linked Combs to the car explosion and that the jury could be improperly swayed by sensationalized claims. In their motion, Combs’ attorneys claimed the testimony lacked probative value and served primarily to inflame the jury by suggesting Combs was capable of criminal violence outside the specific charges at hand. They also contended that Cudi’s statement about the threat was hearsay and should have been excluded on evidentiary grounds. Prosecutors pushed back, maintaining that the testimony helped establish a broader context of coercive control and threats used to silence or punish those connected to Cassie Ventura. The judge has yet to issue a final ruling on the motion, but the attempt signals the defense’s broader strategy: to discredit accuser-aligned witnesses whose stories point to a pattern of intimidation, while narrowing the jury’s focus strictly to the charges in the indictment. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Diddy's attorneys ask judge to strike out Kid Cudi's bombshell testimony about disgraced rapper's revenge plot | Daily Mail Online Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Despite the explosive nature of key witness testimony—most notably from former girlfriend Cassie Ventura—the prosecution’s case against Sean "Diddy" Combs could face significant challenges due to credibility concerns and the risks posed by cross-examination. While multiple witnesses have supported Ventura’s claims of abuse, coercion, and trafficking, legal experts caution that the effectiveness of their testimony may be undermined if the defense successfully exposes inconsistencies, biases, or ulterior motives. Ventura’s allegations are central to the case, but they may not be sufficient to secure a conviction on their own. The defense is expected to aggressively question the reliability of the government’s witnesses, potentially reframing even graphic and emotionally charged testimony as exaggerated or strategically tailored. If jurors sense that the prosecution is leaning too heavily on character-based accusations without strong supporting evidence, the strategy could backfire. The trial’s outcome may ultimately depend not just on what was said, but on how jurors perceive the credibility, consistency, and intent behind the testimony presented. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Regina Ventura, Kerry Morgan deliver strong testimony in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Despite the explosive nature of key witness testimony—most notably from former girlfriend Cassie Ventura—the prosecution’s case against Sean "Diddy" Combs could face significant challenges due to credibility concerns and the risks posed by cross-examination. While multiple witnesses have supported Ventura’s claims of abuse, coercion, and trafficking, legal experts caution that the effectiveness of their testimony may be undermined if the defense successfully exposes inconsistencies, biases, or ulterior motives. Ventura’s allegations are central to the case, but they may not be sufficient to secure a conviction on their own. The defense is expected to aggressively question the reliability of the government’s witnesses, potentially reframing even graphic and emotionally charged testimony as exaggerated or strategically tailored. If jurors sense that the prosecution is leaning too heavily on character-based accusations without strong supporting evidence, the strategy could backfire. The trial’s outcome may ultimately depend not just on what was said, but on how jurors perceive the credibility, consistency, and intent behind the testimony presented. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Regina Ventura, Kerry Morgan deliver strong testimony in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' trial | Fox News Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the civil case Doe v. Combs et al., filed on February 4, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:25-cv-00996-JLR), the plaintiff, identified as John Doe, brings forth multiple allegations against defendants Sean Combs and Bad Boy Records. The claims include human trafficking, sexual battery, assault, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contract. Doe asserts that from approximately 2007 to 2012, Combs engaged in non-consensual sexual acts, including forcible anal penetration, and subjected him to physical confinement in various locations, including hotel rooms and Combs' residence. Additionally, Doe alleges that Combs' continuous death threats and coercion prevented him from asserting his rights within the statutory period, leading to claims under the California Trafficking Victims Protection Act and other related statutes. The complaint further contends that Bad Boy Records benefited from and facilitated Combs' alleged misconduct by maintaining an environment that enabled these actions. Doe claims that the defendants' actions have caused him significant monetary damages, physical injury, and severe psychological distress. He seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The lawsuit emphasizes that due to the alleged continuous threats and coercion by Combs, Doe was compelled to delay filing the action, and it argues that the defendants should be estopped from invoking the statute of limitations as a defense. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In the civil case Doe v. Combs et al., filed on February 4, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:25-cv-00996-JLR), the plaintiff, identified as John Doe, brings forth multiple allegations against defendants Sean Combs and Bad Boy Records. The claims include human trafficking, sexual battery, assault, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of contract. Doe asserts that from approximately 2007 to 2012, Combs engaged in non-consensual sexual acts, including forcible anal penetration, and subjected him to physical confinement in various locations, including hotel rooms and Combs' residence. Additionally, Doe alleges that Combs' continuous death threats and coercion prevented him from asserting his rights within the statutory period, leading to claims under the California Trafficking Victims Protection Act and other related statutes. The complaint further contends that Bad Boy Records benefited from and facilitated Combs' alleged misconduct by maintaining an environment that enabled these actions. Doe claims that the defendants' actions have caused him significant monetary damages, physical injury, and severe psychological distress. He seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The lawsuit emphasizes that due to the alleged continuous threats and coercion by Combs, Doe was compelled to delay filing the action, and it argues that the defendants should be estopped from invoking the statute of limitations as a defense. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Steve Goncalves, the father of Kaylee Goncalves, has been very outspoken about his daughters death and the investigation that has followed. In a new interview with Fox news, he is once again speaking out about the investigation and his lack of confidence in where things currently stand as we are now in the third week since the grizzly murders. (commercial at 8:45) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.foxnews.com/media/idaho-murder-victim-kaylee-goncalves-father-reveals-feel-confident-police-investigation Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Steve Goncalves, the father of Kaylee Goncalves has not been shy about what he hopes happens to Bryan Kohberger if Kohberger is convicted. Mr. Goncalves wants the ultimate justice and after the state of Idaho has filed the paperwork with the court saying they will pursue this as a capital case, Mr. Goncalves has gotten his wish. In this episode, we hear from Mr. Goncalves who gave an interview to NBC news. (commercial at 7:26) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Dad of Idaho Victims Reacts to Death Penalty News (today.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 12-3-22 We have heard from a whole host of experts in regard to the investigation in Moscow and in this episode, we head right back down that road as we hear from a former prosecutor and politician from Idaho who has a few opinions about how the murder (s) might have entered the residence. (commercial at 6:42) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: https://www.foxnews.com/us/former-idaho-prosecutor-who-visited-house-students-were-murdered-reveals-killers-possible-path Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 7-1-23 The family of Kaylee Goncalves are happy that the death penalty for Bryan Kohberger has been announced, but they are not so happy about the fact that the scene of the crime is set to be demolished before the trial begins. They fear that the house might come into play at some point during the trial and they want to avoid it becoming an issue. The University of Idaho, who owns the rights to the house now, have said their plans remain unchanged and they will go ahead with the demolition of the home as soon as they are prepared. (commercial at 7:06) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Kohberger crime scene: Goncalveses family wants jury visit (lawandcrime.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

From the archives: 1-25-23 Bryan Kohberger is facing four homicide charges in Idaho after Police say he murdered Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin at the home located on King Road in Moscow Idaho. Idaho is a state that has the death penalty on the books so the question is, will the prosecutor attempt to go for it? Let's talk about it. (commercial at 7:47) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho Murders: Legal Expert Discusses Possibility of Death Penalty (people.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.