The Moscow Murders and More

In his charging requests submitted to the court, Sean “Diddy” Combs and his legal team are seeking to shape the jury instructions in a way that narrows the scope of the government’s accusations and emphasizes the burden of proof required for a conviction. Central to the requests is the insistence that jurors be explicitly instructed not to infer guilt based on Diddy's celebrity status, past lifestyle, or media portrayals. The defense wants the judge to highlight that fame and wealth are not indicators of criminality, and that allegations alone—no matter how salacious or repeated—do not amount to evidence. Furthermore, they ask that any references to other alleged “bad acts” not directly charged in the indictment be carefully limited to prevent undue prejudice. The defense is also pushing for jury instructions that stress the presumption of innocence and the government’s obligation to prove each element of every charge beyond a reasonable doubt. They are particularly focused on the RICO charges, asking that the court clarify the complex nature of racketeering law and caution jurors not to convict based merely on association with others accused of wrongdoing. By parsing the instructions this way, Combs’ team is attempting to preemptively insulate him from the cumulative weight of the government’s broader narrative, which alleges years of systemic abuse, coercion, and criminal enterprise. Ultimately, these requests are a tactical maneuver to keep the trial tightly focused on the evidence at hand—and to limit the emotional or cultural weight the prosecution hopes to bring into the courtroom. to contact me: bobbycapucci source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.273.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In his charging requests submitted to the court, Sean “Diddy” Combs and his legal team are seeking to shape the jury instructions in a way that narrows the scope of the government’s accusations and emphasizes the burden of proof required for a conviction. Central to the requests is the insistence that jurors be explicitly instructed not to infer guilt based on Diddy's celebrity status, past lifestyle, or media portrayals. The defense wants the judge to highlight that fame and wealth are not indicators of criminality, and that allegations alone—no matter how salacious or repeated—do not amount to evidence. Furthermore, they ask that any references to other alleged “bad acts” not directly charged in the indictment be carefully limited to prevent undue prejudice. The defense is also pushing for jury instructions that stress the presumption of innocence and the government’s obligation to prove each element of every charge beyond a reasonable doubt. They are particularly focused on the RICO charges, asking that the court clarify the complex nature of racketeering law and caution jurors not to convict based merely on association with others accused of wrongdoing. By parsing the instructions this way, Combs’ team is attempting to preemptively insulate him from the cumulative weight of the government’s broader narrative, which alleges years of systemic abuse, coercion, and criminal enterprise. Ultimately, these requests are a tactical maneuver to keep the trial tightly focused on the evidence at hand—and to limit the emotional or cultural weight the prosecution hopes to bring into the courtroom. to contact me: bobbycapucci source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.273.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​On April 24, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler issued a ruling on the admissibility of key evidence in the trial of Bryan Kohberger, who is accused of the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. The judge determined that the majority of the 911 call made by one of the surviving roommates could be presented to the jury, as it falls under exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as present sense impression and excited utterance. However, certain portions of the call, including statements made by an unidentified woman relaying secondhand information, were deemed inadmissible due to lack of firsthand knowledge and contemporaneity. Additionally, the judge allowed the use of a transcript of the 911 call as a demonstrative aid during the trial, provided it is properly authenticated and accompanied by appropriate jury instructions. ​ Regarding text messages exchanged between the two surviving roommates, D.M. and B.F., the court found that many of these messages are admissible under the same hearsay exceptions. These texts, sent in the early hours of November 13, 2022, include descriptions of a masked intruder and expressions of fear and confusion, which the court considered to be spontaneous reactions to a startling event. The judge emphasized that the admissibility of these messages is contingent upon the prosecution establishing the necessary foundation at trial. The defense had objected to the inclusion of these messages, arguing that they lacked context and could be misleading; however, the court concluded that, when properly contextualized, they are relevant and admissible. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho judge deals more defeats to Bryan Kohberger’s defense | Idaho Statesman Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response regarding his motion to strike the death penalty due to his diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The defense asserts that Kohberger's ASD results in significant impairments in communication, reasoning, social skills, and understanding others' reactions—factors that, according to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Atkins v. Virginia, diminish moral culpability and render the death penalty unconstitutional for individuals with such disabilities. They emphasize that these deficits have been present since early childhood and persist into adulthood, affecting Kohberger's adaptive functioning despite his high intelligence quotient (IQ). The defense references the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), noting that individuals with ASD may exhibit a substantial gap between intellectual abilities and adaptive functioning, leading to challenges in daily living, self-care, socialization, and communication. ​ to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Ty A Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The journey through the court documents continues in this episode as we take a look at the Yik Yak warrant. (commercial at 8:26) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 030723+Order+to+Seal++Redact+-+Yik+Yak+Inc.pdf (amazonaws.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

The Moscow Police department was under heavy criticism and pressure to solve these murders and at the start of the investigation, they shot themselves in the foot with poor communication that ended up seeing them walk back previous comments. However, the actual police work behind the scenes was exceptional. In this episode, we take a look at the work behind the scenes by the investigators using the newly released documents as a guide. (commercial at 12:25) to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho search warrants show Moscow homicides police work before Bryan Kohberger’s arrest (yahoo.com) Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response concerning his Motion in Limine #7, which seeks to exclude testimony related to a witness's identification of the intruder based on "bushy eyebrows." The defense argues that such testimony is highly subjective and could lead to wrongful convictions, emphasizing that mistaken identifications have historically been a leading cause of such outcomes in the United States. They contend that allowing the witness, referred to as D.M., to describe the intruder's "bushy eyebrows" would be tantamount to an in-court identification of Kohberger, which they believe is inappropriate given the circumstances. Furthermore, the defense highlights that D.M. has a personal interest in drawing eyes and eyebrows, suggesting that her focus on this feature may not be a reliable basis for identification. They also point out that D.M. was interviewed multiple times by law enforcement, and her descriptions evolved over these interviews, raising concerns about the consistency and reliability of her testimony. The defense asserts that admitting such subjective identification could unfairly prejudice the jury and undermine Kohberger's right to a fair trial. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Ty A Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the morning of June 6, 2025, during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, a woman identified as "Jane" resumed her testimony, providing harrowing details about their relationship. She described being coerced into participating in prolonged, drug-fueled sexual encounters, often referred to as "freak-offs" or "hotel nights," which involved male escorts and were orchestrated by Combs. Jane recounted instances where she was pressured to engage in unprotected sex, despite her objections, and felt compelled to comply due to her financial dependence on Combs, who paid her rent and provided substantial cash payments. Jane's emotional testimony included accounts of feeling disgusted with herself and expressing a desire to end these encounters, only to be met with dismissive responses from Combs. She read aloud text messages from 2023 in which she conveyed her distress, stating that the sexual encounters made her feel like they were "the only reason you have me around and pay for the house." Combs' response was reportedly, "Girl, stop." Her testimony aligns with earlier statements from other witnesses, including singer Cassie Ventura, who have accused Combs of similar patterns of abuse and coercion. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: (2) Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial continues with investigation into Cassie Ventura relationship | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

It is an uphill battle for "Jane" to maintain her anonymity in the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial due to the extraordinary public interest and media scrutiny surrounding the case. The combination of Combs’ celebrity status, the severity of the charges—racketeering, sex trafficking, and related offenses—and the cultural weight of the #MeToo movement has turned this trial into a national spectacle. Every courtroom development is being live-blogged, dissected on social media, and aggressively pursued by entertainment outlets, making it difficult for any witness to avoid public exposure. Additionally, "Jane" has provided some of the most graphic and emotionally charged testimony thus far, implicating Combs in deeply disturbing acts that drive the government’s core narrative of coercion and abuse. Her role is so central that her testimony is likely to be the subject of intense post-trial analysis and media pursuit, increasing the risk of her identity leaking through unofficial channels even if the court maintains a protective order. Moreover, federal courtrooms, unlike many state courts, do not allow video recording or live broadcasting, which does offer some protection. However, this is counterbalanced by the aggressive reporting of major outlets and the presence of numerous journalists in the courtroom, all eager to unearth every detail about the key witnesses. The very nature of "Jane’s" testimony—recounting intimate and traumatic experiences—has already made her a figure of intense curiosity. Compounding this, her prior relationship with Combs, her visibility in the New York nightlife scene, and mentions of specific events and dates in testimony create a breadcrumb trail that determined parties, whether members of the press or online sleuths, could follow to uncover her real identity. In such a high-profile case, history shows that anonymity is difficult to preserve once public and media obsession reaches a certain pitch. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Who is Jane? Diddy trial's anonymous witness testifies Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the afternoon of June 5, 2025, during Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial in Manhattan, a woman testifying under the pseudonym "Jane" recounted harrowing experiences from their relationship, which began in late 2020. She described being coerced into participating in prolonged, drug-fueled sexual encounters, termed "hotel nights" or "freak-offs," often involving male escorts and excessive use of baby oil—sometimes up to two dozen bottles in a single session. These events, she testified, were orchestrated by Combs, who would direct the activities while observing and masturbating. Jane detailed how she was expected to wear specific attire, such as provocative lingerie and high heels, and adhere to Combs' preferences regarding her appearance, including hair and nail styles. Despite expressing her discomfort and repeatedly telling Combs that she did not want to engage in sex with other men, she felt compelled to comply due to his financial control over her, including paying her rent and providing substantial cash payments. Jane's testimony aligns with earlier accounts from other witnesses, including singer Cassie Ventura and former assistant "Mia," who have accused Combs of similar patterns of abuse and coercion. During her emotional testimony, Jane spoke softly, often avoiding eye contact with Combs, who was present in the courtroom. The proceedings were marked by heightened tension, especially after Judge Arun Subramanian admonished Combs for attempting to interact with the jury through nods and facial expressions, warning that any further misconduct could result in his removal from the courtroom. The trial, now in its fourth week, continues to delve into allegations that Combs used his influence and resources to exploit women over a span of two decades to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: June 5, 2025 - Day 17 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia’s behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses. The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury’s potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense’s strategy. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In a filing to Judge Subramanian in United States v. Combs, S3 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government requests permission to admit limited additional testimony from expert witness Dr. Dawn Hughes. This request comes in response to what prosecutors describe as "forceful and repeated" arguments made by the defense during their cross-examination of the witness known as Mia. The defense, the Government argues, presented misleading implications about Mia’s behavior and credibility—specifically regarding how victims of abuse are expected to act. Prosecutors contend that this line of questioning has "opened the door" for rebuttal testimony addressing misconceptions about trauma responses. The Government seeks to have Dr. Hughes offer expert insight drawn from her original notice, focused solely on clarifying how victims of abuse often exhibit behaviors that may seem counterintuitive to jurors unfamiliar with trauma psychology—such as delayed reporting, continued contact with abusers, or minimized disclosure. This testimony, they assert, is necessary to correct the jury’s potential misinterpretation created by the defense's narrative. The request is framed as narrow in scope and designed not to go beyond the boundaries previously set by the Court, but rather to preserve the integrity of the witness's testimony in light of the defense’s strategy. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.376.0_1.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, the government submits its proposed jury instructions, also known as “requests to charge,” ahead of Sean Combs’ upcoming trial. These instructions lay out how the jury should interpret the law as it applies to the charges in the Third Superseding Indictment, including conspiracy, racketeering (RICO), drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and related offenses. The government requests standard instructions on presumption of innocence, burden of proof, credibility of witnesses (including cooperating witnesses and law enforcement), and the meaning of reasonable doubt. Critically, it also asks the court to include specific legal definitions tied to each alleged crime—for example, the elements of a RICO enterprise and the requirements for proving participation in a drug distribution conspiracy. Furthermore, the government includes instructions regarding the consideration of co-conspirator statements, evidence of prior bad acts, and accomplice testimony, reflecting the sensitive and complex nature of the allegations against Combs. The proposed charges emphasize that the jury must evaluate the case based solely on the evidence presented, without speculation or bias, and that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. These instructions, if accepted by the judge, will guide the jury through the legal standards necessary to determine whether Combs is guilty on any or all of the multiple felony counts he faces. The submission underscores the government's intent to secure clear, legally sound guidance for the jury in what is expected to be a high-profile and multifaceted trial. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.275.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

In this filing, the government submits its proposed jury instructions, also known as “requests to charge,” ahead of Sean Combs’ upcoming trial. These instructions lay out how the jury should interpret the law as it applies to the charges in the Third Superseding Indictment, including conspiracy, racketeering (RICO), drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and related offenses. The government requests standard instructions on presumption of innocence, burden of proof, credibility of witnesses (including cooperating witnesses and law enforcement), and the meaning of reasonable doubt. Critically, it also asks the court to include specific legal definitions tied to each alleged crime—for example, the elements of a RICO enterprise and the requirements for proving participation in a drug distribution conspiracy. Furthermore, the government includes instructions regarding the consideration of co-conspirator statements, evidence of prior bad acts, and accomplice testimony, reflecting the sensitive and complex nature of the allegations against Combs. The proposed charges emphasize that the jury must evaluate the case based solely on the evidence presented, without speculation or bias, and that guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. These instructions, if accepted by the judge, will guide the jury through the legal standards necessary to determine whether Combs is guilty on any or all of the multiple felony counts he faces. The submission underscores the government's intent to secure clear, legally sound guidance for the jury in what is expected to be a high-profile and multifaceted trial. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.275.0.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​Bryan Kohberger, charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, has filed a motion titled "Strike Death Penalty RE: Autism Spectrum Disorder" in an effort to remove the death penalty as a sentencing option if convicted. The details of this motion remain sealed, leaving it unclear whether Kohberger has been formally diagnosed with autism or if his defense team is pursuing such a diagnosis. This strategy represents the latest attempt by Kohberger's defense to challenge the application of the death penalty in his case. Previously, his attorneys have argued that Idaho's methods of execution, such as lethal injection and firing squad, constitute cruel and unusual punishment, and that evolving standards in the U.S. reflect a shift away from capital punishment. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-13-RE-Conditions-Aggravator.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In his affidavit, defense expert Sy Ray challenges the State's motion regarding AT&T Timing Advance records in the case against Bryan Kohberger. Ray asserts that AT&T's Timing Advance data, which can accurately determine a mobile device's location, was available and utilized by law enforcement during their 2022 investigation. He provides evidence that the FBI obtained such data from AT&T for over 3,800 devices, excluding Kohberger's, and contends that the prosecution's claim—that AT&T did not produce Timing Advance records in 2022—is misleading. Ray suggests that the absence of Kohberger's Timing Advance data is either a significant deviation from standard investigative procedures or indicative of intentional withholding of exculpatory evidence. He concludes that the prosecution's motion misrepresents the facts and aims to conceal potentially exonerating information. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: 032625+Defendants+Notice+of+Filing+Affidavit+iso+Obj+to+the+States+MIL+RE+ATT+Timing+Advance+Records.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​Bryan Kohberger, charged with the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), according to his defense attorney, Anne Taylor. Taylor argues that this diagnosis should exempt him from the death penalty, contending that ASD diminishes his culpability and that his behaviors, such as avoiding eye contact and repetitive movements, might be misinterpreted by jurors as signs of guilt or lack of remorse. She also highlights that Kohberger's ASD-related communication challenges hinder his ability to participate effectively in his defense. Legal experts, however, are skeptical of this argument's success. They note that while ASD can be considered a mitigating factor during sentencing, it does not typically preclude the application of the death penalty. In Idaho, the death penalty is applicable unless the defendant is intellectually disabled, a criterion distinct from ASD. Therefore, despite the defense's efforts, it is unlikely that Kohberger's ASD diagnosis will prevent prosecutors from seeking capital punishment in this case. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Kohberger’s team: Autism should negate Idaho death penalty. Experts say it’s a stretch Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​Prosecutors in the Bryan Kohberger case have introduced evidence indicating that Kohberger purchased a Ka-Bar knife, along with a sheath and sharpener, from Amazon between March 20 and March 30, 2022—approximately eight months prior to the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students. A knife sheath found at the crime scene contained Kohberger's DNA, strengthening the prosecution's argument that the sheath belonged to him. Additionally, prosecutors have obtained a selfie Kohberger took hours after the killings, which they plan to use to corroborate an eyewitness description of the suspect having "bushy eyebrows." The defense has filed motions to exclude Kohberger's Amazon purchase history and the "bushy eyebrows" description from trial, arguing that such evidence is prejudicial and could deny him a fair trial. Despite these efforts, the prosecution maintains that the Amazon purchase history is relevant, as it shows Kohberger's acquisition of a knife matching the sheath found at the crime scene. The trial is scheduled to begin on August 11, 2025, with prosecutors indicating their intent to seek the death penalty if Kohberger is convicted. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Idaho prosecutors: Kohberger bought Ka-Bar knife, sheath | Idaho Statesman Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

​In Case Number CR01-24-31665, defendant Bryan C. Kohberger has filed a reply to the State's response concerning his motion to exclude Amazon click activity evidence at trial. Kohberger's defense argues that the State's recent expert disclosures, submitted on March 14, 2025, are untimely and violate discovery deadlines, potentially infringing upon his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. The defense emphasizes that Amazon's data is intricate, involving complex algorithms and machine learning processes that cannot be accurately interpreted without expert testimony. They contend that presenting this data without proper context would mislead the jury, especially given the incomplete and selectively presented nature of the evidence. Furthermore, the defense highlights that the State's attempt to self-authenticate the Amazon records without expert explanation is inappropriate due to the complexity of the data. They assert that the State's pattern of late disclosures and failure to comply with court orders regarding evidence and expert opinions hampers Kohberger's ability to prepare an effective defense. As a result, the defense seeks to protect Kohberger's constitutional rights by requesting the exclusion of the Amazon click activity evidence from the trial. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Ty A Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

On the morning of June 5, 2025, the federal sex trafficking trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs in Manhattan continued with the defense's cross-examination of Bryana "Bana" Bongolan, a close friend of Combs's ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Bongolan had previously testified about a harrowing 2016 incident where Combs allegedly dangled her over a 17th-floor balcony while shouting profanities, then threw her onto furniture, causing physical injuries. During cross-examination, defense attorneys sought to challenge her credibility by highlighting inconsistencies in her account, questioning her history of drug use, and pointing out her involvement in a separate lawsuit against Combs. Despite these efforts, Bongolan maintained her allegations, which align with Ventura's earlier testimony describing a pattern of abuse and coercion by Combs. Following the conclusion of Bongolan's testimony, prosecutors prepared to call a key witness, identified only by the pseudonym "Jane," to the stand. Jane is expected to provide testimony about her alleged experiences with Combs, including participation in so-called "freak-off" sex marathons and instances of abuse. Her account is anticipated to reinforce the prosecution's case, which portrays Combs as orchestrating a pattern of manipulation and exploitation over several years. The court has taken measures to protect Jane's identity, including restricting media access during her testimony. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: @innercitypress Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.